🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a solid foundation," commented the parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any action must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, support built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful online content suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and fit for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to follow the Australian path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other states are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this international debate continues, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that states around the world are increasingly prepared to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.